I can’t be
the only person reading this and feeling the arc and "reader feels" of The Shining, which, since I read it two
weeks ago is still very fresh in my mind. The
Amityville Horror has a slow-burning start with loads of backstory. Unlike The Shining, anything horrific is told
with emotional detachment, so it doesn’t feel gut wrenching. At all. It’s a
little inferior in that respect, but not terribly. Also unlike The Shining these characters don’t seem
to have anything particularly wrong with them. They were just fine—right up
until they encountered the house. But there is a similarity. It (the house/demonic
force) affects each of the family members differently, and one family member in
particular. And that one is the five year old. Everyone’s behavior changes, but
the dad becomes impatient, particularly with the children. And it’s cold. And
that hedge/stone lion moves. And being born with a caul causes psychic ability.
Rip off.
But then Twilight was a rip off of Pride and Prejudice, and did I like it?
Damned straight, I did.
I’m
not saying it’s not worth reading. In fact, I think I enjoyed this reading
experience better because once the tension built, it maintained a consistent level
of enjoyable WTF, without pushing me beyond
my comfort zone. Stephen King, however, almost always pushes me past where I’m
comfortable. Some things I particularly liked: The way the house affects
EVERYONE, including those who simply visit. AND that a momentary interaction
with the house is enough for them to carry its malevolence away with them, like
a virus. The priest with his car trouble, flu, and blisters. The brother and
his money. Even the paranormal investigator who catches the flu before even arriving.
It’s interesting that the house’s power isn’t constrained to just the property
on which it stands. It tags along, effing things up for people who even think
about the place. That’s fun.
Gawd, I’m
shaping up to be such a pessimist. I hate to harp on what I didn’t like.
Really, The Amityvile Horror was a
fun read, and I didn’t want to put it down. I’d totally read another Jay Anson
book—probably 666, which is the only
one he wrote between Amityville Horror (1977) and his death in 1980.
But
sometimes the action in this book was down-right irritating. Like, hey, crazy
shit is happening in this house. Stone lions moving, weird smells, unseen
presences, but it doesn’t even occur to Kathy, the mom, that the green goo
could be a paranormal manifestation too (226). It must be those blasted kids.
And when George (the dad) brings his dog inside to see if he senses anything,
the dog reacts to exactly the things
we expect him to—the secret room in the cellar, the sewing room, and Missy’s
room. And George acts like he doesn’t understand why the dog would possibly behave strangely—“‘Goddammit, Harry…What’s
bugging you?’”—when that’s exactly why he’s dragging the dog room-to-room in
the first place. And then—“‘Nothing
happened, that’s what happened,’ he said” (259). Perhaps he was expecting the
dog to write a dissertation regarding his suspicions and discomfort, since
George is blind to canine forms of communication. Sigh.
And then
there’s the priest—Father Mancuso. I get why he wouldn’t want to go back to the
house, but why doesn’t he just send another priest. Or someone to attempt an
exorcism? He’s just like, “Sorry, suckas—you’re on your own. I’m not going to
help you, therefore the Church can’t help you.” Thanks, buddy. May your itchy
palms sprout humiliating hairs.
Based on a
true story, my ass. But I wonder how much it increases a book’s sales if you
swear on your grandmother’s grave that it’s true. Not that I’m interested in
besmirching my grandmother’s grave. I’m just curious. Ahem. For a friend, of
course.
Anson, Jay. The Amityville Horror. New York: Pocket Star, 1977. Print.
It's pretty interesting. One of the Lutz kids has since come forward to claim the house WAS haunted but not horribly so--just the usual, 100+ year old New England house on the water with its attendant ghost.
ReplyDeleteYeah, Kristin, I was really irked by George's blind stupidity too. When he drags Harry around the house, Harry reacts predictably at all the right places and all George sees is that "nothing happened!" Really?
ReplyDeleteAnd I agree that it felt a little strained when Kathy's first reaction to the weird green goo is "Damn kids!" And this was way before you could buy that sticky, green goo in a plastic tub from Wal-Mart!
I'm kind of surprised that no one makes a big deal about how Jay Anson died just 3 years after he wrote this book. Coincidence? I think not!
Kristin,
ReplyDeleteAwesome write-up. You make some great observations, I didn't love this book, but I didn't hate it either...I was in the middle. I will say, this was the only one that truly scared me, because even after all these years, I still thought the thing was true until I researched it the second day. I had to turn it off the first night....it freaked me out....the second day I was listening to it alone with my eyes closed and my wife hit me with a sweatshirt (I didn't know she was walking by) I almost crapped my pants! It was a quick and fun read...and back before Snopes and the internet...how did people really confirm if this stuff happened or not? No wonder it was a huge hit...it was a trailblazer. And like you said, a pretty fun read.
Maybe I read it as detached as it was written, because I just didn't feel the fun there. I suppose it did have a "simple pleasure" way about it. I didn't need to get into any kind of "mood" to read it. I could just pick it up and start reading, day or night. It made me feel comfortable, like I could be myself around it.
ReplyDeleteYes, Kristian nice write up you make excellent points as always. The priest was a character I didn't understand either, it was so random and isn't it his job to help people, especially when they are being attacked by evil? I'm just saying, religion is supposed to be the anti evil pill(though we all know this is sadly not true) his character is definitely frustrating and not necessary.
ReplyDelete